- Republican House members have intensely questioned SEC Chair Gary Gensler on his regulatory approach, which they argue has hindered innovation in the U.S.
- Gensler maintained a defiant stance while fielding inquiries from lawmakers, who took turns discussing important regulatory issues concerning digital assets.
During the Republican House Financial Committee Hearing on Tuesday, SEC Chair Gary Gensler faced tough scrutiny as lawmakers questioned him about critical digital asset issues as well as his regulatory approach. He has encountered bipartisan criticism regarding his administration’s tendency to regulate through enforcement, a strategy believed to be stifling the cryptocurrency sector and curtailing innovation.
“The Most Destructive and Lawless SEC Chair in History”
Rep. Tom Emmer, the Republican House Majority Whip, has characterized Gensler as the “most destructive and lawless SEC Chair in history.” During the recent Committee Hearing, Emmer aimed to underline Gensler’s significant role in the Commission’s stringent regulatory stance on the digital asset sector.
“Your hiring methods and the culture you foster seem to prioritize loyalty to you over adherence to the law and the mission of the SEC,” Emmer asserted.
Emmer also referenced the Debt Box case, in which Judge Robert Shelby from the District of Utah reprimanded the SEC for overreaching in its attempts to freeze the crypto firm’s assets under false pretenses.
“Chair Gensler, can you recall any other instance where the SEC has faced sanctions from a court due to material misrepresentation?” he inquired.
Throughout the questioning, Gensler appeared defensive and did not offer a direct response, prompting Emmer to “reclaim” his time, responding “No” for Gensler concerning the Debt Box issue.
Rep. Emmer criticized the SEC Chair after a few inquiries, highlighting the agency’s regulatory negligence, lack of clear guidance for the digital asset realm, and incompetence, suggesting these factors contributed to VP Harris’ promise to establish clear regulations for the industry upon her presidency.
“…You made a sweeping claim that most assets are crypto asset securities…You initiated your entire enforcement campaign over the past three years based on this constructed notion, only for your attorneys to backtrack in a court footnote just last week.”
“Your inconsistencies on this matter, sir, have set our country back. This country has never seen a more severely damaging or lawless SEC Chairman. I yield back.”
Harris Camp’s Stance Against SEC’s Regulation By Litigation
Billionaire investor Mark Cuban reported that he spoke with Vice President Harris’ team recently, who indicated they oppose “regulation through litigation.” Cuban suggested that Gensler’s departure from the SEC may be forthcoming, hinting that it could positively impact GDP growth.
Earlier this week, VP Harris unveiled her administration’s plans for crypto and AI, asserting that her office will “promote innovative technologies such as AI and digital assets while safeguarding consumers and investors.”
The Democratic candidate also expressed that her administration “will establish a secure business environment with clear and consistent rules.”
This could signal a turning point for Gensler, especially in light of former President Trump’s vow to “fire Gary Gensler” on his first day in office, paired with Harris’ supportive comments towards cryptocurrency. Although a president cannot directly dismiss an SEC Chair, they can exert pressure for them to resign.
Dutch
English
French
German
Greek
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish